https://bloodposture.blogspot.com/2021/12/mds-90-surveyed-plan-peaceful-death-no.html
MDs (90% surveyed) plan 'peaceful death: no heroics, no CPR, no futile care, no hospitals, no surgery/treatments' in their own advanced directives 1948 to date
Medical Directive: DNR No CPR, No Risky Invasive Procedures or Futile Heroics or Immature Rx; Comfort & Natural ex Oxygen-Minerals, Belgian or Swiss MAID+ ex Dignitas (LWK 220803)
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AnfIEjvOaOrkkS2kt2tVV9-sFXTR
NO: coerced/forced manual feeding: honor any form of water/food refusal ex turn away or spit up.
NO: coerced/forced exercise/rehab: honor any form of refusal to engage rehab/exercise.
* if i can't speak for myself, no matter my state of mind, refusal to eat/drink, to exercise/rehab or to continue treatments ex pills/rx/injections, no matter the dire consequences, shall be honored.
* if i refuse pills, food or drink, turn my head away, or make efforts to avoid being fed, if coughing, gagging, spitting up, choking, or if i seem indifferent to being fed, then discontinue. no matter my condition, do not coax, cajole, coerce, harass, or force me to eat drink, or take pills. do not misinterpret any reflexive opening of my mouth as a desire for food or drink or as giving consent to being fed.
* dying by starvation is natural enough and a clear innate expression of one's final free will choice.
* refusals of any kind should not be chastised, ignored or bypassed, should instead be respected.
excerpt 2: i do not consent to any mandate
infectious disease: i support all-voluntary 'your body your choice' interventions that guarantee us all body/health sovereignty. if others feel compelled to over-wash, over-sanitize, over-mask, over-test, over-vaccinate aka sabotage all natural immunity, it's ill-advised, so dont force it on others or minors.
i do not consent to any state or medical mandates:
* to any screening, testing, masking, vaccination, handwashing, sanitation, distancing, isolation.
* to immature strong medicine/rx with under-reported risks and less than 20-year human/fertility studies.
* to inaccurate invasive fault-prone testing ex swabs of deep nasal or throat. the PCR inventor warned PCR are far too inaccurate to use for diagnostic purposes for a reason.
* to risky toxic leaky vaccines, that do not maintain 98% protection for 20 years; have less than 10 years of human safety/fertility studies; with high risk of severe long-term health risks to vital organs, systems, functions incl inflammation, thrombosis, respiratory and neurological; where the vax-makers are legally immune to vaccine-injury lawsuits and healthcare costs; that include toxins and fetal tissue.
* any of a dozen bootcamp vaccines may have caused/amplified my various neurological disabilities.
* see section 'why i do not consent'.
excerpt 3: no invasive rx treatments
NO: invasive rx treatments (no matter how routine) incl high risk non-curative medicine/rx/vaccines
* no emergency/experimental use rx, no leaky 'vaccines' that fail to protect 20 years against infection.
* open to low-risk, generic off-label rx with 20+ year long-term human geno/neurotoxicity studies.
* avoid non-curative long-term rx that antagonize this, inhibit that, yet never heal or cure root issues.
* open to minimally-dosed targeted antibiotics/anti-parasitics etc that help the body heal itself and to comfort medicine ex painkillers, sedatives, muscle relaxers, sleeping aids, more natural vs synthetic.
NO: masks that restrict/lower oxygen-in-air (19.5% minimum) or clothing that limit joint movement.
excerpt 4: why i do not consent
why i do not consent: legit evidence-based science does not support all doomsday epidemiology data/stats which are reliably 95% wrong/askew aka vastly inflated, fraudulent or falsified illegitimate incl false positives, cases, deaths, icu, ppe. and germ theory is half flawed. no aspect of the germophobic narrative has any actual scientific merit, yet is pushed by corrupt state bureaucrats, fraudsters and groupthink devotees of the state/media/tech brainwash trust.
germ-avoidance robs the immune system of the opportunity to adapt. sabotaging our natural immunity by over-washing our skin's immune system and over-sanitizing the surfaces we share is counter-productive. weakening our natural immunity is never a good idea.
98% of us should want to get infected and hold out for robust natural immunity. with a low <1% death/icu rate, high case/infection/transmission rates are very good news, highly desirable, not to be feared. yet state/pharma/msm spin these to overhype the hysteria as if death/icu rate was 50x higher.
same is true for natural immunity which tends to last a lifetime. the herd's ability to maintain robust immunity requires us to share droplets, touch shared surfaces, breathe shared air droplets, be in close proximity/crowds without excess washing/sanitizing. for eons pre-covid, sniffling students in class gave teachers robust immunity, as sick patients did for healthcare staff and cash-handling for cashiers.
per the constitution, sovereignty over your life/body was granted to you by your creator/nature, not by the state. the state was created to protect our individual, human birthright liberties. founders knew about smallpox, black plague yet made no such exceptions to 'suspend' any of our liberties.
many studies, some associated to WHO/CDC, show masking, vaxxing, distancing and lockdowns do not mitigate the spread, so there is no math logic science justification to employ any such mitigations.
and why risk a drug/vax if its makers have made themselves and their profit margins immune from legal liability so the vax-injured are unable to seek compensation for severe life-altering injuries?
for all these reasons, voluntary mitigations, not mandates, is the only approach in a free society for all health threats. if you feel safer to vax or mask, test, track or stay home, you can, it's your freewill choice. your body your choice, my body my choice. nobody (or organization) has the right to force their medical will on another no matter the perceived threat or relative justifications often overhyped.
if vaccines really worked, then why aren't they working? whether others get one or not has no bearing on whether yours works or not. vaccines either provide robust 98-99% protection for decades or they dont work at all aka are just shots, too leaky to be labeled vaccines.
if masks really worked, then why aren't they working? why not give prisoners masks instead of releasing felons? answer 1: masks can't stop viruses/particles 100-1000x smaller than bacteria. answer 2: mandating oxygen-reducing masks would violate prisoners' civil rights.
this is an overhyped multi billion dollar endless germ racket making several new billionaires in the vax/mask/ppe sectors and bigtech/media/bigboxstore with each new variant/booster wave. all those who trust in the sham, the germophobic hysteria and mandates, are gullible victims of false narrative news.
meanwhile, any legitimate scientist/researcher in predictive epidemiology who points out errors, like in climatology, get smeared/censored. we are seeing multiple scam rackets using the same playbook.
* i would only agree to risky leaky vaccines after residing 9 months in Belgium with access to physician assisted euthenasia, and only if incarceration is imminent and prisoners have no choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment