tangent: fiber/regularity
he also touches on why to avoid fiber supplements for healthy gut regularity aka psyllium husk (or senna) as counterproductive for many. my naturopath says the same, wants me to avoid those and other fermented foods in the gut which include yoghurt, pickles, beer, coleslaw, probiotics etc. so i'm primed.
'take a fiber supplement' is the automatic tv-branded suggestion, but that is a bad idea according to some researchers (see below).
irregularity, in my case, is most likely from the neuropathy/parkinsonian nerve impairments and alternatively my Rx, then again, i could still be eating wrong, but how exactly?
while eating more raw vegetables/fruit and the skins rarely hurts, it's apparently easy to eat too much fiber, and doing it for 'better health' or to improve constipation etc. actually pose more problems than they solve aka excess fiber and supplementation may be counter productive. (more below)
- Over 70,000 (0.5%) may be killed or injured by colonoscopy-related complications, not including the increased risk of all other cancers from radiation exposure.
- X-ray exposure from a single virtual colonoscopy increases one's lifetime risk of cancer by 20%.
- According to the American Cancer Society (in 2009) "…there are no prospective randomized controlled trials of screening colonoscopy for the reduction in incidence of or mortality from colorectal cancer."
- National Cancer Institute is even more explicit: "…it is not yet known [in 2009] for certain whether colonoscopy can help reduce the number of deaths from colorectal cancer."
- Colonoscopy screening increases mortality from all other causes.
- 95% of all polyps removed are benign so why remove them?
- flat lesions are 5x as cancerous as large polyps yet are not removed.
- Increased cancer risk: Removing polyps or even doing biopsies releases cancer cells into the bloodstream and the colon's lumen. In turn, these cells may seed all other cancers throughout the body.
- invasive screening and polypectomies in asymptomatic people under 70 is absurd.
- No demonstrable benefit to polypectomies.
- Prep risk: 85,000 people die annually from kidney failure, many of these deaths have been precipitated by a careless and damaging colon prep.
- Prep risk: Colonoscopy prep causes severe dehydration. It may result in dizziness, syncope, ischemic stroke, blood clotting, sudden cardiac death, a fall or accident, medication overdose, and other complications.
- Anesthesia risk: deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are a common side effect related to general anesthesia.
- Anesthesia risk: 25% of all people develop chest infections after general anesthesia, and many older people die weeks or months later from acute pneumonia.
- Over 70,000 patients get injured by colonoscopy, according to actual reports. The unreported injury rate may be close to 280,000, or 2%.
- The potential long-term death toll from all other cancers caused by polypectomy-related contamination, and radiation exposure from virtual colonoscopies, is in the millions.
The number of casualties above doesn't include deferred complications from colon prep and general anesthesia, such as kidney failure, stroke, heart attack, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, intestinal obstruction, and numerous others. Nor does it include the increased risk of all other cancers from radiation exposure caused by virtual colonoscopies. Thus, if you are close to or past 50, and have been considering screening colonoscopy, the next 9 minutes may save your life and prevent other cancers:
Part I. The Anatomy Of A Deadly Deception (10min)
Https://Youtu.Be/WoREV5D1DLQ View On YouTube. Read Transcript.
- Dramatic increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer. Despite tens of millions of screening colonoscopies performed between the years 2000 and 2007, the annual incidence of colorectal cancer in the United States increased by about 30,000 more cases.
- More polyps are missed than found. Up to a third of all colonoscopies routinely miss polyps and cancerous tumors. According to the report I cited at the beginning of this page, practically 100% of all polyps are missed in the right (ascending) colon.
- Increased cancer risk from radiation. X-ray exposure from a single virtual colonoscopy increases one's lifetime risk of cancer by 20%. Virtual colonoscopies are now recommended every 5 years. By age 70 one's risk of developing any other form of cancer grows to 100%. Killing you with another form of cancer before the colon gets affected is one hell of a way to "prevent" colon cancer.
- Polypectomy doesn't prevent cancers. According to the research published back in 2006, the screened patients in all of the studies developed colorectal cancer "at the same rate as would be expected in the general population without screening" in the next few years, even though they have removed all found polyps.
- No clinical research to support the rationale of colonoscopy screening. According to the American Cancer Society, up until now (2009) "…there are no prospective randomized controlled trials of screening colonoscopy for the reduction in incidence of or mortality from colorectal cancer." In other words, the recommendation to undergo colonoscopy screening is based entirely on its income potential, not proven health benefits.
- No clinical research to support the effectiveness of virtual colonoscopies. The National Cancer Institute is even more explicit: "…it is not yet known [in 2009] for certain whether colonoscopy can help reduce the number of deaths from colorectal cancer." and "Whether virtual colonoscopy can reduce the number of deaths from colorectal cancer is not yet known."
https://youtu.be/hASGunjONs0 View on YouTube. Read transcript.
- Overblown risk of colorectal cancer death. The risk of colorectal cancer is exaggerated for commercial purposes. Even a person in a high-risk group is 12 times as likely to die from heart disease; 10 times from any other cancer, 6 times from a medical error, 3 times from stroke, and twice as likely to die from an accident.
- A large-scale investigation of colon cancer screening using annual or biannual Fecal Occult-Blood (FOB) tests demonstrated near-complete futility of this approach. The eighteen-years-long Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study included 46,000+ patients between the ages of 50 and 80. It demonstrated only a 0.6% reduction in the incidence of colorectal cancer. Statistically speaking, this difference is even less than the chance outcome of one thousand coin flips.
So, what relevance does the FOB test have for screening colonoscopies? Well, if you can't meaningfully reduce the incidence of colon cancer with annual or biannual FOB screenings, how in the world can you reduce it by doing colonoscopies every five or ten years? Sorry, but you can't! - Colonoscopy screening increases mortality from all other causes, research shows. The Telemark Polyp Study I demonstrated a 157% increase in mortality among screened patients vis-à-vis unscreened controls. The decrease in the incidence of colorectal cancers was only… 2%, which, statistically speaking again, is essentially none at all. In the video I mistakenly indicate 57% increase in mortality instead of 157%.
- Colorectal cancer is a lifestyle disease. The majority of colorectal cancers aren't hereditary, and the majority of people in the high-risk group never develop one either. This means that colorectal cancer is connected to lifestyle factors, just like lung cancer is connected to one's smoking.
https://youtu.be/1PEOpCCxsxY Watch on YouTube. Read transcript.
- An estimated 95% of all polyps are benign. They will never become cancers, so removing them makes just as much sense as zapping the moles off your buttocks to prevent melanoma.
- Not all colorectal cancers are preceded by detectable polyps. It is believed an even larger share of colon cancers start from flat lesions that no one is suggesting to remove, even though they are considered five times as cancerous as large polyps.
- Increased cancer risk. Removing polyps or even doing biopsies releases cancer cells into the bloodstream and the colon's lumen. In turn, these cells may seed all other cancers throughout the body.
- Unreliable procedure. Even the most thorough endoscopists may miss up to 30% of detectable polyps. The less rigorous routinely miss up to 60%, including actual cancer tumors. All of them, regardless of skill or attention, miss 100% of polyps in the right colon.
- Unnecessary procedure. The average age for colorectal cancer diagnosis is 72. Commencing invasive screening and polypectomies in asymptomatic people at age 50 is just as absurd as taking contraceptives after menopause.
- High risk of internal bleeding. Polypectomy profoundly increases patients' risk of death from hard-to-detect internal bleeding, which may lead to ischemic stroke, myocardial ischemia, cardiac arrest, or sudden cardiac death.
- No demonstrable benefit. If polypectomies were, indeed, effective, with about half of Americans past age fifty getting screened, we should have enjoyed at least a 50% reduction in the incidence and mortality of colon cancer. Instead, we have a 22% increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer. Most likely, this increase is related to polypectomies.
https://youtu.be/2aSHuGVtMdU Watch on YouTube. Read transcript.
- Irreversible kidney damage. Over 85,000 people die annually from kidney failure — that is almost 50% more than from colorectal cancer. Many of these deaths have been precipitated by a careless and damaging colon prep.
- Severe dehydration. Colonoscopy prep causes severe dehydration. It may result in dizziness, syncope, ischemic stroke, blood clotting, sudden cardiac death, a fall or an accident, medication overdose, and other complications. The death rate related to these side effects is not known.
- Chronic bowel disorders. Bowel movement disruption following colonoscopy commonly leads to chronic constipation, severe diarrhea, diverticulitis, and bowel obstruction. All of these conditions constitute a primary cause of inflammatory bowel disease. That factor alone increases the risk of colon cancer by 32 times!
- Severe heart disease. The confirmed rate of severe cardiovascular risk from general anesthesia for low-risk surgical procedures, such as colonoscopy, ranges from 0.27% to 1.1% within the first six days after the surgery.
- Blood clotting and pulmonary embolism. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are a common side effect related to general anesthesia. Pulmonary embolism causes or contributes to up to 200,000 deaths annually in the United States.
- Chest infection and pneumonia. An estimated 25% of all people develop chest infections after general anesthesia, and many older people die weeks or months later from acute pneumonia. The mortality rate from pneumonia is 5%, and about 60,000 people die annually — more than from colorectal cancer.
- Complications and medical errors related to colonoscopy. At least 70,000 patients get injured by colonoscopy, according to actual reports. The unreported injury rate may be close to 280,000, or 2%.
- Increased risk of all other cancers. The potential long-term death toll from all other cancers caused by polypectomy-related contamination, and radiation exposure from virtual colonoscopies, is in the millions.
- No measurable impact relative to effort. Even according to Katie Couric, who has a penchant for exaggeration, colorectal cancer mortality is down just 2,500 cases a year, or under 2% of all deaths, a value too small to be considered a definite trendsetter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. Why is there such a large spread between colon cancer incidence and colon cancer death?
Q. Do you believe Ms. Couric knowingly "sold her soul" to the promoters of colorectal cancers?
Q. Aren't you too harsh on this poor woman?
Q. What about medical doctors, are they complicit in this scheme?
Q. If virtual colonoscopies are so harmful, why are they permitted and encouraged?
Q. What was Ms. Couric's financial gain in promoting colonoscopy screening?
Q. Are you concerned with getting hit with a defamation lawsuit by Ms. Couric or her proxies?
Q. How did you, and not the medical doctors, come up with this information?
Additional Reading
The following sections expand on above videos with practical advice and additional commentaries:
» Side Effects Of Screening Colonoscopies
» Frequently Asked Questions About Screening Colonoscopies
» Colorectal Cancer Prevention
You can also access all these sections from selected sidebars.
A wealthy acquaintance of mine died at the age of 56 from brain cancer. His brain tumor was probably contributed to by earlier treatment for colon cancer. In turn, his colon cancer was probably caused by frequent virtual colonoscopies and coronary angiograms — a preventative computer-assisted x-ray (CT scan) of, respectively, the colon and heart.
With a strong conviction that money can buy just about anything, a $1,000 scan to him was less than $1 to most people. So, why not, as he once told me, buy some "peace of mind," right? Apparently not...
I wrote my books and developed this site for people who still value a buck and wish to prevent common gastrointestinal disorders and escape colorectal cancer without relying on cancer-causing screening colonoscopies, addictive laxatives, harmful fiber supplements, ineffective and deadly drugs, and irreversible, complication-prone surgeries.
The information on this site complements and expands the content of Gut Sense and Fiber Menace. Both books evolved from my extensive research in the field of forensic nutrition. Unlike orthodox nutrition, which studies and promotes "health food, " forensic nutrition studies why people get sick and die from a presumably "healthy " diet.
Konstantin Monastyrsky
You probably believe fiber prevents colon and breast cancer, lowers cholesterol, reduces the risk of heart disease, regulates blood sugar, wards off diabetes, curbs the appetite, induces weight loss, cleanses the colon, arrests diarrhea, unplugs constipation. Tragically, none of this is true!
In fact, fiber-rich foods and fiber supplements are either the primary cause of most of these conditions, or major contributors. Please watch my investigative report to learn the truth. If you consume fiber for any health reasons, the next 14 minutes will turn your life and health around:
- Harvard School Public Health: large studies fail to show high fiber diets lower risk of colon cancer.
- USFDA strong evidence shows no benefit exists re dietary fiber and colorectal cancer.
False Claim #2. Fiber Prevents Breast Cancer.
False Claim #4: Fiber Protects People From Diabetes.
- indigestible fiber is a primary cause of juvenile diabetes
- interferes with glucose metrics, blocks assimilation of medication and essential nutrients
False Claim #7. Fiber Keeps The Colon Clean
The truth is, fiber slows colon motility and causes congestion [of stools].
- fiber is the #1 cause of chronic constipation, hemorrhoids, diverticulosis, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease.
- fiber makes your colon really clogged.
False Claim #8. Fiber Relieves Chronic Constipation.
- According to the experts from the American College of Gastroenterology's Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders Task Force, all legitimate clinical trials "did not demonstrate a significant improvement in stool frequency or consistency when compared with placebo."
An undeniable fact: The people of Japan enjoy the highest longevity in the world. And the traditional Japanese diet - based around fish, sea food, and white rice - is practically fiber-free.
Forensic nutrition investigates connections between food and diseases, while traditional nutrition promotes connections between food and health.
- You run a 1 in 1000 risk of dying of a colonoscopy which is far higher than the risk of colon cancer.
- One in every 200 to 350 colonoscopies results in serious complications 5.6 percent chance – about one in twenty — you'll be hospitalized sometime within one month of your colonoscopy.
- Infections: endoscopes get clogged with tissue, blood, feces, etc and even after hours in glutaraldehyde solution (a preservative), they still trap pathogens aka the equipment cant be 100% disinfected.
- Perforations: 1 in 800 chance of internal perforations (gashes/cuts) thus bleeding/infection. 52 per 800k will die of perforations (65 per million).
- Dysbiosis (bad/good gut bacteria imbalance): you'll be asked to flush your intestines with harsh synthetic laxatives and a bowel wash, killing all good and bad bacteria amplifying risk of infection and colon cancer.
- Anesthesia: add risks of blood clots, hypoxia (low oxygen), aspiration pneumonia, cardiac arrhythmias, and it's entirely unnecessary, ask for none at all.
- False positives: the more screenings you have, the greater chance you'll eventually get a false positive and false positives lead to unneeded treatments for non-existent cancer.
what to do instead:
- Eat more vegetables lowers your risk of cancer
- Get the fiber in psyllium seed husk, flax, hemp, and chia seeds boosts healthy gut bacteria. [this is contested above by presenter #1]
- Get the phytochemicals in plants reduce inflammation
- Garlic lowers your risk of colon cancer 35%, so enjoy it liberally.
- Get outside for 15 minutes a day without sunscreen, near solar noon.
- Don't let your doctor bully you into doing any test you feel uneasy about.
The tragic risks of a colonoscopy - Cancer Defeated
Every year, about 15 million Americans undergo a colonoscopy. About 15,000 of them die. Not from the cancer. From the screening.1
Colorectal (colon and rectum) cancer kills about 50,000 Americans every year. It's the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. But out of a population of 319 million, your risk of death from this particular illness is pretty low. In contrast, your one in a thousand risk of dying of a colonoscopy is actually much higher.
Even if we take the 109 million Americans over the age of 50 who are in a high risk category for cancer – and then assume all 50,000 colorectal cancer deaths are in that age group – the death risk is still less than 5 out of 10,000. Way lower than the one in a thousand risk of dying of a colonoscopy.
So this ranks as a dangerous test.
The medical profession promises colonoscopy could save your life. My doctor says I should get one about every ten years (I've had two already). But now I've learned you're more likely to die from this routine cancer screening than from the cancer it tries to prevent.2
Here's the real story. . .
Continued below. . .
Breast Cancer Survivor was told: Doctors didn't give Wiltrude much hope when they diagnosed her with cancer in the year 2000. Wiltrude, a German psychologist, never thought cancer would happen to her. But it did. And it came as a big shock. One doctor told her, "You'll be dead in a year." Late stage breast cancer is virtually incurable using conventional treatments. Even M.D.s admit it. They talk about "buying you more time." (Don't count on it. The evidence shows you're better off doing nothing than chemo.) When Wiltrude told her doctor she was going to try alternative treatments, he said, "You are committing suicide with what you're doing." But she was determined to find a way to beat her cancer. Thanks to the wonders of the Internet, this European woman came across a book by my good friend Bill Henderson, one of the smartest and wisest people I know when it comes to cancer treatment. She tried Bill's top, number one recommendation — a gentle treatment you can do at home for just $5.15 a day. What's more, the cost goes down to $3.50 after six weeks because you just need a maintenance dose. And it even tastes good. Not only has Wiltrude passed the five-year cancer survival mark, she's survived for 12 years. We just interviewed her recently for this publication. The radiologist who tests her every year told her, "You're the only one with this kind of result." You can find out more about Bill's proven cancer treatment plan if you click here. When I ask him about some of the treatments that top alternative doctors use, Bill sort of shrugs and says, "They're fine, but why bother? My treatment works, you can do it yourself, and it costs practically nothing." He's coached thousands of cancer patients with all different types and stages of cancer. Most of the people who follow the detailed, specific plan in this Special Report get over their cancer and live for years. "Almost any kind of cancer is reversible," says Bill. "I never give up on anyone." Click here to learn more about Bill's amazing cancer protocol. |
If you think you're too young to have to worry about colon cancer, think again.
For adults between 20 and 39, the risk of colon cancer has increased from one to two percent a year in the last 30 years.3 Young adults now have double the risk of colon cancer and quadruple the risk of rectal cancer seen in previous generations.4
But alarming as it is, it's nothing compared to the risk of colonoscopies.
A risky exam
One in every 2005 to 3506 colonoscopies results in serious complications.
Those complications are ten times more likely in colonoscopies than in any other commonly used cancer-screening test, according to the Annals of Internal Medicine.7
Dr. Harlan Krumholz, director of the Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, says that 1.6 percent of low-risk, healthy patients who get a colonoscopy suffer a complication requiring hospitalization within seven days.8
An additional one percent are hospitalized seven to 14 days after their colonoscopy, and three percent are hospitalized within 30 days after their procedure.9
That's a 5.6 percent chance – about one in twenty — you'll be hospitalized sometime within one month of your colonoscopy. Is that really acceptable?
Six common complications of colonoscopy
We'll get to alternatives in a moment. But first, the five most common complications…
Infections: Doctors use a long, flexible tube (an endoscope) to see inside your body during a colonoscopy. Endoscopes have a tiny camera at the end so doctors can see inside your stomach or colon. If the camera gets covered in blood, they clean it off with a water and air nozzle, which is a breeding ground for infection.
Retired EPA microbiologist Dr. David Lewis notes that scopes get so clogged with tissue, blood, feces, and other patient 'material' that water and air can't pass through the tube.
The air/water channel is so miniscule you can't get a brush in to clean it.
So clinics 'clean' endoscopes by submerging them in a 2 percent glutaraldehyde solution for 10 to 15 minutes.
Don't bet on it being clean when you come in for your procedure!
Dr. Lewis says even after spending two hours in that solution, endoscopes still trap pathogens. Some of those may be antibiotic-resistant ones, especially considering the kinds of microbes that run wild in hospitals.
Here's the secret your doctor's never told you:
Glutaraldehyde acts like formaldehyde. So instead of dissolving tissue, blood, and flesh… it preserves them. These preserved remnants build up over time and can readily infect you during your colonoscopy.
Perforations: You also have a one in 800 chance of internal perforations (gashes and cuts)10 resulting in bleeding, hemorrhaging, and infection.
These dangerous side effects often don't show up till a day or several days after your procedure.11
Because of this delay, doctors rarely connect the dots back to the colonoscopy.12 These perforations are considered 'random.' But 'random' doesn't preclude deadly.
For every 1,000 people who suffer perforations during colonoscopy, 52 of them die.13 Roughly 52 out of 800,000 people who originally undergo the procedure die of perforations.
Dysbiosis is an imbalance between the protective (good) and harmful (bad) bacteria in your gut.
Before your colonoscopy, you'll be asked to flush your intestines with harsh synthetic laxatives and a bowel wash, killing both your good and bad bacteria in one fell swoop.14
Without good bacteria, your intestines are at high risk.
These laxatives and washes are linked to irregularity, constipation, IBS, Crohn's, hemorrhoids, diverticulosis, and other diseases that actually increase your risk of colon cancer.15,16
Anesthesia complications: You shouldn't need anesthesia for a colonoscopy. But because doctors like to race through them as fast as possible, you'll get it.
Anesthesia comes with its own dangers and complications, including blood clots – especially dangerous if you have diabetes or heart disease.17 It can also cause hypoxia (low oxygen), aspiration pneumonia, cardiac arrhythmias, abdominal pain, and nausea.18 It can also effect cognitive function and memory – and that makes me very reluctant to ever undergo another colonoscopy.
If you must have a colonoscopy, ask for the lightest sedative possible – or none at all.
False negatives: This one is related to the use of general anesthesia. Doctors prefer to "put you under" because they want to work fast. That's not a good thing. The New England Journal of Medicine notes that doctors, because they're working so quickly, completely miss full-blown colon cancer 15 to 27 percent [average 20%] of the time that cancer polyps are actually present.19
They seem to be more bent on speed than accuracy.
False positives: The National Cancer Institute notes that the consistency of colonoscopies is 'poor.'20 As might be expected, the more screenings you have, the greater chance you'll eventually get a false positive.
After four screening tests, men have a 36.7 percent chance of getting a false positive and women have a 26.2 percent chance.
After 14 tests, it skyrockets to a whopping 60.4 percent of false positives for men and 48.8 percent for women, per the Annals of Family Medicine.21 That's a lot of colonoscopies, so this isn't typical.
False positives lead to unneeded treatments for non-existent cancer. If the treatments are conventional, that's always harmful. Aside from the physical harm, the mistaken cancer diagnosis puts you and your family on an emotional roller coaster.
Asking these 3 questions could save your life
Don't just take your doctor's suggestion on faith. Ask questions. Rinse and repeat.
It could save your life – because precious few doctors even know about these risks, let alone advise you on them. You can argue that they should, but they don't.
1. Why not do a FOBT or sigmoidoscopy instead?
There are three ways to screen for colon cancer – colonoscopy, fecal occult blood test (FOBT), or flexible sigmoidoscopy test.
A colonoscopy is the riskiest of the three, yet doctors recommend it 95 percent of the time.22 Yes, even holistic doctors, sadly. The other two tests have 10 times fewer complications than colonoscopies.
2. What cleaning agent do you use to clean your scopes?
If they say glutaraldehyde (Cidex is the most common brand), run the other way. Cancel your appointment, or don't make it in the first place.
Find a lab that uses peracetic acid 100 percent of the time. Only about 20 percent of labs use it because it's more expensive and time-consuming. Peracetic acid actually dissolves proteins. It's by far your safest bet.
3. How many of your colonoscopy patients end up in the hospital within one month after their colonoscopy for any reason?
Even if you feel uncomfortable asking, this is must-know information. You deserve answers, so don't accept a blow-off response. Listen to what your gut tells you.
Keep cancer far from your colon
Naturally, if you're smart about caring for yourself and avoid known triggers, you can radically reduce your risk of colorectal cancer, and by extension, your need for screening. Here are three simple lifestyle hacks:
Adjust your diet.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) considers processed meats — hotdogs, sausages, luncheon meats, and salami — carcinogenic, especially for colorectal cancer.23 So eat accordingly.
On the other hand, eating more vegetables lowers your risk of cancer.24
- The fiber in psyllium seed husk, flax, hemp, and chia seeds boosts healthy gut bacteria, promotes healthy bowel movements, and lowers your risk of colorectal cancer.
- Phytochemicals in plants reduce inflammation and usher carcinogens from your body.
- Garlic lowers your risk of colon cancer 35 percent.25 So enjoy it liberally.
Get outside for 15 minutes a day without sunscreen, near solar noon.
Vitamin D deficiency boosts your risk of nearly every type of cancer.26
Most Americans are woefully low in this vitamin. Get your levels tested a couple times a year and keep them between 45 and 60 nanograms for cancer protection. Take vitamin D3 orally if necessary, especially during the winter when you may not get much sun.
Exercise.
Active people are 30 to 40 percent less likely to get colon cancer compared to inactive people, because it...27
- Reduces your insulin levels, and in turn, your cancer risk.
- Triggers apoptosis, or natural cancer cell death.
- Boosts immune function, helping you fight infections and diseases like cancer.
- Reduces belly fat (a risk factor for many types of cancer, including colon cancer).
There's so much you can do to avoid becoming a statistic. So grab hold of the reins, do your homework, and don't let your doctor bully you into doing any test you feel uneasy about.
No comments:
Post a Comment