Medical Directive: DNR No CPR, Futile Heroics, New Rx, Invasive Procedure; Minimalism, Oxygen, Minerals, Vitamins, Comfort & Mercy DWD MAID+

5-10min...

 

with 2 of 3 MDs talking parkinsonism, with my directive updated (below), my next task is to source a disability lawyer.

many stories inspired me to create a comprehensive, specific and redundant 'advance directive' incl multiple horror stories on NPR of written wishes not honored and learning most MDs since 1940s in their own directives declare the intent to 'die peacefully with no CPR/hospitals or default medical interventions beyond pain/comfort care' which is a dead giveaway by people in-the-know.  

 

https://bloodposture.blogspot.com/2021/12/mds-90-surveyed-plan-peaceful-death-no.html
MDs (90% surveyed) plan 'peaceful death: no heroics, no CPR, no futile care, no hospitals, no surgery/treatments' in their own advanced directives 1948 to date

 

the 2021 update is now pandemic-proof (longer by 5 pages) incl a history of symptoms ex breathing as proof it predates covid (aka isn't covid so dont test me with a faulty PCR brain swab).  

 

the first 7 pages outline my medical preferences in any and all scenarios, medical treatments I want and don't want and when I'd rather be put down by Rx like we do with animals (MAID medical assistance in dying).

pages 8 to end are background writings spanning a few years to show i did not suddenly have these thoughts after health decline and to flesh out what may seem like a deathwish (and in some ways is) so that it feels redundantly explained for family friends.

while long, there might be a handful of ideas in first 4 pages anyone can borrow and retrofit into yours.  for that reason, i copied 3 excerpts below incl forced feeding borrowed from other horror stories.  you cant be too specific or too redundant with these.  

i also incl page 9 'why i do not consent' which is quick ref informative thus worth sharing (see below).

cloud copy (printable)

https://1drv.ms/w/s!AnfIEjvOaOrkkSJT8V2Qfj1iqrvX

excerpt A

NO: coerced/forced manual feeding: honor any form of water/food refusal ex turn away or spit up.
NO: coerced/forced exercise/rehab: honor any form of refusal to engage rehab/exercise.

* if i can't speak for myself, no matter my state of mind, refusal to eat/drink, to exercise/rehab or to continue treatments ex pills/rx/injections, no matter the dire consequences, shall be honored.

* if i refuse pills, food or drink, turn my head away, or make efforts to avoid being fed, if coughing, gagging, spitting up, choking, or if i seem indifferent to being fed, then discontinue. no matter my condition, do not coax, cajole, coerce, harass, or force me to eat drink, or take pills. do not misinterpret any reflexive opening of my mouth as a desire for food or drink or as giving consent to being fed.

* dying by starvation is natural enough and a clear innate expression of one's final free will choice.
* refusals of any kind should not be chastised, ignored or bypassed, should instead be respected.

excerpt B

i do not auto-consent to any state or medical mandates re viruses or infectious disease:

* to new strong medicine/rx with under-reported grim risks and less than 30-year human studies.

* to inaccurate, high false-positive testing ex PCR swabs of deep nasal passages or throat. fault-prone testing (PCR inventor warned they're far too inaccurate to use for diagnostic purposes)

* to any screening, testing, masking, vaccination, handwashing, sanitation, distancing, isolation.

* to risky toxic leaky vaccines; that do not maintain 98% protection for 15+ years; with less than 5 years of human safety/fertility studies; with high risk of severe long-term health risks to vital organs, systems, functions incl inflammation, thrombosis, respiratory and neurological; if the vax-makers are legally immune to vaccine-injury lawsuits and healthcare costs; that include toxins and fetal tissue.

excerpt C

NO: invasive rx treatments (no matter how routine): high risk strong medicine/rx/vaccines

* no emergency/experimental use rx, no leaky vaccines that don't last 20+ years.

* open to low-risk rx; generic and off-label rx with 30+ year long-term human studies vs newer rx.

* open to temporary use medicine to help you heal ex antibiotics vs long-term rx at antagonize this and inhibit that but never heal or cure; avoid rx not used by veterinarians and animal cruelty rx.

* open to minimally-dosed targeted antibiotics/anti-parasitics etc and comfort medicine ex painkillers, sedatives, muscle relaxers, sleeping aids, more natural vs synthetic, that can help the body heal itself.

NO: masks or clothing that restrict/lower oxygen-in-air (19.5%+ intake) or limit joint movement.

excerpt D

why i do not consent: legit evidence-based science does not support all doomsday epidemiology data/stats which are reliably 95% wrong/askew aka vastly inflated, fraudulent or falsified illegitimate incl false positives, cases, deaths, icu, ppe. and germ theory is half flawed. sneezing/coughing into one's arm i can support, but no other aspect of the germophobic narrative has any merit, yet is pushed by swamp bureaucrats, fraudsters and groupthink devotees of the state/media/tech brainwash.

germ-avoidance robs the immune system of the opportunity to adapt, sabotaging our natural immunity by over-washing over-sanitizing our skin's immune system and the surfaces we share is counter-productive. weakening our natural immunity is never a good idea.

with 99% rx, we should want to get infected and hold out for robust natural immunity. with a low <1% death/icu rate, high case/infection/transmission rates are very good news highly desirable; not to be feared. yet state/pharma/msm spin these to overhype the hysteria as if the death/icu rate was 50%.

same is true for natural immunity which tends to last a lifetime. the herd's ability to maintain robust immunity needs us to share droplets, touch shared surfaces, breathe shared air droplets, be in close proximity/crowds without excess washing/sanitizing. for eons pre-covid, sniffling students in class gave teachers robust immunity, as sick patients did for healthcare staff and cash-handling for cashiers.

per the constitution, sovereignty over your body was granted to you by your creator/nature, not by the state. the state was created to protect our individual, human birthright liberties. founders knew about smallpox, black plague yet made no such exceptions to 'suspend' any of our encoded liberties.

many studies, some associated to WHO/CDC, show masking, vaxxing, distancing and lockdowns do not mitigate the spread, so there is no math logic science justification to employ any such mitigations.

and why risk a drug/vax if its makers have made themselves and their profit margins immune from legal liability so the vax-injured are unable to seek compensation for severe life-altering injuries?  

for all these reasons, voluntary mitigations, not mandates, is the only way in a free society for all health threats. if you feel safer to vax or mask, test, track or stay home, you can, it's your freewill choice. your body your choice, my body my choice. nobody (or organization) has the right to force their medical will on another no matter the perceived threat or relative justifications often overhyped.

• if vaccines really worked, then why aren't they working? whether others get one or not has no bearing on whether yours works or not. vaccines either provide robust 98-99% protection for decades or they dont work at all aka are just shots, too leaky to be labeled vaccines.

• if masks really worked, then why aren't they working? why not give prisoners masks instead of releasing felons?  answer 1: masks can't stop viruses/particles 100-1000x smaller than bacteria.  answer 2: mandating oxygen-reducing masks would violate prisoners' civil rights.

this is an overhyped multi billion dollar endless germ racket making several new billionaires in the vax/mask/ppe sectors and bigtech/media/bigboxstore with each new variant/booster wave. those who trust in the sham, the germophobic hysteria and mandates, are gullible victims of false narrative news.

meanwhile, any legitimate scientist/researcher in predictive epidemiology who points out errors, like in climatology, get smeared/censored. we are seeing multiple scam rackets using the same playbook.